Closed annagustavsson closed 1 year ago
Yes that is very good suggestions. Change "type" -> "side" Add "type" as alpaca-type values Keep "status" since this is up to us to use however we see fit. It often has similar values as the alpaca-type values, but we have states that are not - and should not require to be- represented in their list of values.
This causes no changes in DB. However, maybe it would be reasonable to change the field "type" in DB to "side". To prevent confusion. In DB, our field "type" has values that correspond to the alpaca API's field "side".
@ Alpaca:
@ our DB: