Closed madninja closed 3 years ago
:fire:
Any opinions on backwards-compatibility? I have a similar question with the .env change but don't have strong opinion either way.
It breaks headless updates, but could just alert people in #blockchain whenever there's a change requiring manual intervention
The .env issue is a breaking change which needs to get patched up. I missed that when doing the .env changes in the Makefile
The location search changes are a new route, and added migrations so a normal migration and restart would work as always.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM Jamie Wilkinson @.***> wrote:
🔥
Any opinions on backwards-compatibility? I have a similar question with the .env change but don't have strong opinion either way.
It breaks headless updates, but could just alert people in #blockchain whenever there's a change requiring manual intervention
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/helium/blockchain-etl/pull/137#issuecomment-803612363, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAACZBXBS4VV52L64IUTO6LTEYLBBANCNFSM4ZRRMT3A .
Cool, I will adjust my .env patch this evening to be backwards-compatible. Adds more code but nice to not break anything
This adds a postgis extensioon dependency and a geometry column and index for locations.
It also adds a backfill
location_geometry
to backfill locations with their geometry information.