Mismatch between lorawan-on-helium/frequency-plans/frequency-plans and countries_reg_domains

[BenoitDuffez]

The table here: https://github.com/helium/docs/blob/master/docs/lorawan-on-helium/frequency-plans/frequency-plans.mdx

doesn't match what the miner will use: https://github.com/helium/miner/blob/master/priv/countries_reg_domains.csv

e.g. Colombia is listed as US915 (902-928) on the docs but AU915 (915-928) in the CSV file.

[BenoitDuffez]

Colombia fixed with https://github.com/helium/docs/pull/342 but there are others pending (Bolivia, Costa Rica, Ecuador for example)

[shawaj]

@BenoitDuffez i updated the miner CSV in https://github.com/helium/miner/pull/772 to match the latest LoRa Spec RP002-1.0.3

But I think the table for "Frequency Plans by Country" and the listing about "Frequency Plans" in general needs updating here as you say... https://github.com/helium/docs/blob/master/docs/lorawan-on-helium/frequency-plans/frequency-plans.mdx

Will give it a first go this evening and submit for yours (and others) review

[shawaj]

Created #345 which brings it in to line with CSV updated in https://github.com/helium/miner/pull/772

[caleiton]

Currently there are no hotspots deployed in Costa Rica, but I know people whom already purchased the US915 model and they are waiting shipping. There is a difference between RP002-1.0.3 document, which says Costa Rica is AS-923-1. However in other documents we see Costa Rica as US902-928 which in theory is compatible with US915. https://docs.helium.com/lorawan-on-helium/frequency-plans/ Will the US915 will work on CR?

[shawaj]

@caleiton the LoRa doc is correct

[caleiton]

So people installing US915 devices here as they were following the existing document, those hotspots won't be accepted by the Helium network?

[shawaj]

It would need to be as923-1 yes

[samgutentag]

closing resolved issue