Closed PaulVMo closed 3 years ago
[Following up from #rak-wireless in helium discord]
Thanks for spotting and correcting this discrepancy. I thought you were implying that only EU898 was incorrect. Are you certain that RSSI offset is the same for all regions? I can certainly imagine that the error is applicable on the whole, but I can also image that that with different band-specific RF conditioning they could vary a little.
Good point. I am not certain. Going off this repo https://github.com/Lora-net/sx1302_hal/tree/master/packet_forwarder then, you may be correct that it may not be all. EU868 and US915 seem to use -215.4. While CN470 uses -207. I am not sure what the right value would be for others.
Based on this comment - https://discord.com/channels/404106811252408320/768197263842607164/799798439876624414
Are we saying -215.4 then?
That's my perspective - specifically for 865/868 and 915/920/923 bands it looks like the offset should be -215.4. For 470 bands, based on the original Lora config, it looks like those are -207 (no change needed).
@PaulVMo cool will update my PR
Personally, I'd ignore that extra 0.4
. It's within the noise of my measurement setup.
Yeah, not that significant. -215.4 is what the original semtech / lora config uses so my thought was revert back to that - there is probably (hopefully) some good reason they included the 0.4 in the first place.
This is looking good. I'll try to get this merged before the the next release or the one after that at the latest.
Reverted changes to the RSSI offset back to -215.4 which is the default used by RAK and the Semtech 1302 base global_conf file to address issue RAK2287 based hotspots displaying consistently higher RSSI values than hotspots with other concentrators