Open mebbott opened 2 years ago
I was thinking of saving the vocative for spring when they see 1st- and 2nd-person forms.
But otherwise complete paradigms (declensions without vocative) would make sense in module 2, I think.
Okay, assigning myself the task of adding full paradigms (no vocative) after the introduction of indirect and direct object functions.
I put the vocative forms in as I started doing patterns of persistent accents, but we can remove them there. They don't really add anything for learning those patterns.
If you have no objections, I think I should take this one over: it's too easy to include machine-generated declensions!
I've got code that can generate markdown declension tables, with a flag to let you include/omit vocative.
Great! Perhaps these can go in the "review/reference" section—it should be easy enough to turn to that as we are talking about full declensions, right?
Yes. I'll close this when I've pasted those in for Module 2.
Happy to have you take it over, thanks! ————— Mary Ebbott Professor, Department of Classics College of the Holy Cross Worcester, MA 01610 (508) 793-2631
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 5:58 PM Neel Smith @.***> wrote:
If you have no objections, I think I should take this one over: it's too easy to include machine-generated declensions!
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/hellenike/textbook/issues/27#issuecomment-1205809918, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB5GCCBY67EA5I4KUU6MJ3TVXQ4GVANCNFSM55IYGMQQ . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
I like how we are introducing the different cases and their functions in their own sections, along with the endings.
At what point should we show a complete paradigm, with model words? How are we asking them to practice these? Is there an equivalent of a synopsis on the noun / adjective side?
And what about the vocative? Is there a place for introducing that somewhere? It does show up, since Euphiletos is speaking to the jury...