Open helloworld1 opened 9 years ago
Comment #1 originally posted by helloworld1 on 2012-08-03T19:50:04.000Z:
In the current database format, it is very hard to support multiple categories. But I think it is still a nice feature to have. But comparing the benefit and the work needs to be done, it is not quite worthy now. Maybe it can be done next time I will do a major rework of the db format.
Comment #2 originally posted by helloworld1 on 2012-08-04T10:20:25.000Z:
Thanks Liberty for your response. I agree, effort and benefits need to be at least ballanced. Therefore I will wait :-) . Ernst
Comment #3 originally posted by helloworld1 on 2013-02-10T23:23:48.000Z:
One more vote for this.
Comment #4 originally posted by helloworld1 on 2013-04-06T19:54:19.000Z:
Issue 198 has been merged into this issue.
Comment #5 originally posted by helloworld1 on 2013-04-06T19:54:45.000Z:
Issue 198 has been merged into this issue.
Comment #6 originally posted by helloworld1 on 2013-12-12T10:46:32.000Z:
Wildcard match would be useful here. I think that's how previous versions of Anymemo did it. For example, I have many categories ordered in a hierarchy:
french.vocab french.phrases french.grammar french.conjugations
Now if there was some way to specify "french.*" in the filter that would be perfect. All that would mean is changing the SQL query to LIKE instead of =
I vote for this topic.
Original issue 104 created by helloworld1 on 2012-08-03T15:36:36.000Z:
What is the feature you want? I have several db with many (>40) categories, some of the categories consisting sometimes ot not more than 20-30 entries. Sometimes I would like to filter for more than one category. Let's say I would like to learn the vocabulary of the categories "house" and "garden" together ... At the moment I can choose only one category at the same time. Am I wrong?
How important is it to you? Quite
Do you think other people also want this feature and why? I guess so ...