Open qsantos opened 10 months ago
I'm not sure if this was intended and if it is wanted to ignore/filter the messages that lead to buffrs complaining about dirty proto files under vendor. Anyhow since this was a quick one: https://github.com/helsing-ai/buffrs/pull/224
The PR does only include dirty statuses of the files actually being packaged. Should one wanted to add a subdirectory under proto (e.g. submodule that contains additional *.proto files) this solution wouldn't cover that but I'm not sure how much this is relevant as of now.
I think we should get #224 over the line!
When publishing, Buffrs populates the
proto/vendor/
directory. If one attempts to publish again, Buffrs then complains that the repository is dirty. I think Buffrs should either:proto/vendor/
before checking that the repository is cleanproto/vendor/
when checking that the repository is clean