Add "resource" next to the exploit tree in Armitage

[GoogleCodeExporter]

1. If I had a million dollars to pay you (that's what it'd cost if you
weren't so nice), I'd like you to add...
I suggest adding "resource" next to the exploit tree in Armitage, as shown in 
the attachment.
Resource scripts automate discovery, bruteforce, post-exploitation, etc. So I 
think that Armitage should expose them.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by houcem.h...@gmail.com on 15 Feb 2012 at 9:21

Attachments:

• Armitage_2012-02-15-24.png

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This is a really interesting idea. Let me think about it for a day or two. Some 
of the challenges for this:

1. AFAIK, there is no way to dynamically inspect which scripts are available. A 
hand-coded list might be ok if there is a way for the user to add new scripts 
(perhaps a preference key)

2. The real challenge though is how to create a consistent user interface that 
exposes the options of each script without requiring a hard-coded dialog for 
each.

I'll give these some thought though.

Original comment by rsmu...@gmail.com on 15 Feb 2012 at 11:43

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I never thought out a good way to do this. When I developed Cortana, I debated 
making it possible to introduce "virtual" modules in the module browser through 
Cortana scripts. I opted against this though. So far, I still believe the 
module browser should be dedicated to searching, browsing, and launching 
Metasploit Framework modules.

Original comment by rsmu...@gmail.com on 5 Feb 2013 at 9:00

• Changed state: WontFix