Closed chirag-droid closed 6 months ago
oh my... i misspelled wait to want
Would it be possible to reconsider merging this PR? Rebasing the changes made on main before?
I'm trying to add this action to save a bit of time in CI, but I'm loosing more time in the post step than the little time saved + overhead
As said in the issue: I happily merge it once the test-failures are resolved. If @chirag-droid lost interest, maybe you can take over?
As said in the issue: I happily merge it once the test-failures are resolved. If @chirag-droid lost interest, maybe you can take over?
I can take up this issue again. I am diagnosing the failed tests
https://github.com/hendrikmuhs/ccache-action/actions/runs/7697481224/job/22066139179?pr=182
I need help with this test case. And why it's failing.
@chirag-droid not sure about that exact failure, but process exit codes should be positive numbers. 0 means success, non-0 for failure. Generally, process.exit(1)
is what you are looking for in the error handlers.
Thank you @chirag-droid. The 1 failing test doesn't matter. I can fix that manually. I will merge this PR in the afternoon.
Do we need to make a new release? @hendrikmuhs
Is there an update on when we can expect this to be released @hendrikmuhs ?
This is a workaround for me before a new version is released:
- uses: hendrikmuhs/ccache-action@ff9f6cc67d49b9acaa9e102f80d1ea8a0c86a6dd
sorry, didn't had time to make a release. Will do it now.
Issue
fixes: #181
Proposed Changes
Since Node waits for hanging http requests we early exit by calling
process.exit
. This doesn't affect the existing API but we can specify optional parameterearlyExit
that would apply this fix.This is related to https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/47228