Closed altmas5 closed 4 years ago
Hi Man,
i have bad news, this is only ubuntu problems, i check this on my latest debian, centos 7, centos 8 but all works fine:(
Tom
Do you know a way of having separate items based on the distro? I guess that would require LLD or autodiscovery rules
Hi Altmas5,
Same problem here. So if you have updates, please let me know!
Tim
Hi Altmas5,
Same problem here. So if you have updates, please let me know!
Tim
I think I'll have it by next week @twesterbeek .
Hi,
everyone i do make fix for ubuntu right now.
Tom
Please test template with name Template Fail2ban Ubuntu 20.04 i hope version with key: zabbix_agentd -t proc.num[python3,,,fail2ban-server]
works well. Problem is with systemd.
In future with Zabbix Agent 2 you can use: systemd.unit.info["fail2ban.service"]
Yes, that solves it. Thanks @hermanekt
Hi,
This is the second box with Ubuntu 20.04 that I'm deploying with this template, I got this behavior on both of them.
zabbix_agentd -t proc.num[fail2ban-server]
returns zero even when fail2ban is running and the autodiscovery rule is working fine, so no misconfiguration here. I have used this template a lot in the past (thank you BTW).This in the environment:
Running the item
Workaround 1:
Workaround 2 (more precise):
How does the output of a
ps -Af|grep fail2ban
look? :How does the output use to be under
Fail2Ban v0.10.2
: