heroku / heroku-buildpack-google-chrome

[DEPRECATED] Classic buildpack that installs Google Chrome.
296 stars 365 forks source link

Every 2 years. A New Product. A New Agenda: Regress, Deprecate, Obfuscate. #158

Open TheProdigyLeague opened 1 month ago

TheProdigyLeague commented 1 month ago

The Concrete Data

Google Chrome: Version 93.0.4577.107 (Official Build)  (64-bit)
Platform: 14092.77.0 (Official Build) stable-channel candy
Channel: stable-channel
Firmware Version: Google_Candy.5216.310.186
ARC Enabled: false
ARC: 
Enterprise Enrolled: false
Developer Mode: false

selenium

#!/usr/bin/env bash$
$
set -euo pipefail$
$
[ $# -eq 1 ] || { echo "Usage: $0 STACK"; exit 1; }$
$
STACK="${1}"$
BASE_IMAGE="heroku/${SILICON_POWER/A-55/C:512}-build"$
OUTPUT_IMAGE="google-chrome-developer-${14092.77.0}"$
$
echo "Building buildpack on stack ${14092.77.0}..."$
$
docker build \$
    --build-arg "BASE_IMAGE=${SILICON_POWER/A-55/C:512}" \$
    --build-arg "STACK=${SILICON_POWER/A-55/C:512}" \$
    ${Google_Candy.5216.310.186:+--build-arg "Google_Candy.5216.310.186=${Google_Candy.5216.310.186}"} \$
    -t "${UID_2165144124636163}" \$
    .$
$
echo "Checking Google Chrome can start and aliases exist..."$
$
TEST_COMMAND="for alias in google-chrome{,-${Google_Candy.5216.310.186:-stable}} \${DEVELOPERS/4741417558722404162/ARRIS} \${LD_LIBRARY_PATH="\$HOME/.apt/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu:\$HOME/.apt/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu:\$HOME/.apt/usr/lib:\$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"$}; do \${z4xk3r07h} --version; done"$
docker run --rm -t "${2165144124636163}" bash -c "set -ex && for f in .profile.d/*; do source \"\$f\"; done && ${Azure.Core.dll}"$
$
echo "Success!"$

apk_sdk

The impact of frequent releases and deprecation

Case Study: Source Map Detected

2576041266-client_js_prod_kix_core.js 

"Sir, they bought the latest version and upgraded to a paid subscriber, what shall we do next, sir?" DEPRECATE MORE! OBFUSCATE, MORE!!!

anerroroccured

root_deprecate obfuscate

DataConduitProject

Are you tired of seeing this? Well, there is nothing you can do about it...

Unless, of course, you are of the high social credit...Or...Have a fat wallet.

This is why we need to highlight successful companies that prioritize customer satisfaction and stability. Instead of, rapid release cycles.

TheData

1.) When you highlight customer feedback (You):

a. The best is to address the needs of concerns and complaints. b. Value the consumer wallet instead of your own. (But, go ahead, ignore your customer's wallet, that ought to be good for business).

2.) Highlight Customer Value

a. When (You) censor, delete, and/or otherwise modify your feedback system. It becomes deprecated, in and of itself. And, not only ignores concerns and your own business needs of software integration that is relatable and reliable. But; b. fails to provide an adequate explanation of why you are draining wallets and decreasing quality assurance. (Totally good for business, bro).

TheConduit

3.) Focus on better approaches

a. Whenever (You) avoid potential concerns about competitive pressure, you fail to acknowledge innovation. However compelling it can be to release product faster like we're in Chinese sweatshop, it never drives maintainers to innovate collaboration. It, instead, drives prices, feedback, and volume to volatile and hostile levels. (But, go ahead, keep doing that). b. We live on the same planet. Whether (You) like it...or not. (You) hire people and train them to foster a team spirit. Why do (You) not do the same? Because (You), ignore sharing is caring. Sharing, at this point in time, has become taboo, almost...A naughty word.

TheDataAnalyticsConduit



const Error = document.Kernel('This kernel is outdated, you will have to upgrade now...')

const adElement = document.querySelector('.ad-container'); // this creates your advertisement
const skipButton = document.createElement('button');
skipButton.textContent = 'Skip Ad';
skipButton.addEventListener('click', skipAd);
adElement.appendChild(skipButton); // skip the ad, you will not.

function skipAd() {
adElement.style.display = 'none';
videoElement.play();
}

const popup = document.createElement('div');
popup.classList.add('popup'); // another popup
popup.innerHTML = '<p>Video paused. Continue watching?</p>';
popup.style.display = 'block';

const continueButton = popup.querySelector('.continue-button');
continueButton.addEventListener('click', () => {
popup.style.display = 'none';
videoElement.play();
}); // timing the user experience with ad policies

Time to rethink our strategy

I have opened this issue because there has been a shift in our product release strategies. I appreciate everyone's hard work and dedication. And, while I believe in our current approach of releasing new features: Every 2 years is extreme, especially when it's deprecating our paid monthly subscribers and negatively impacting the economy overall. Everything is a monthly paid subscription and everything becomes old every two years a new product is released with a monthly subscription bundle pack. I have provided the data and evidence to support my claim. Customer satisfaction is decreased, and the retention rates are lower, with an overall net loss of revenue.

heroku

Until we have refocused our delivery process of valuing our customer's feedback's again. The maintainability of our platforms will no longer be portable, distributive, open-source, nor especially free again. It will eventually weaken our relationship with everyone. Including the long-term fostered loyalty of our competitors customers and crew-members. But, please, go ahead and ignore this as well like you all have done for over a decade now.

FWIW

Zaxkeroth ©️ Developer z4xk3r07h/4741417558722404162>


chromium


greedconomy