Closed stof closed 4 months ago
Adding a +1 here. We don't use review apps, but we have multiple staging and demo environments running on Essential-tier databases. Forcing us to upgrade these would add hundreds of dollars of monthly cost with no real benefit.
We are exactly the same as @jefflub It's really stunting our development - why was this restricted from Essential?
Same issue here, we use many staging/review apps that are breaking the bank at the moment.
+1
+1, this is breaking our use of review apps
Thank you for your patience! We have an exciting update for review apps and Essential tier databases.
If you haven't done so already, please take a look at this changelog: https://devcenter.heroku.com/changelog-items/2862
We are migrating Essential Mini/Basic databases to the new Essential-0/1/2 databases with a planned GA date of May 8th 2024, which comes with pgvector. If you specified the specific database type in your code (i.e. app.json), please update to specify essential-x
(0/1/2) instead.
At this time, Essential-0/1/2 are in public Beta until May 8th. Here's more information around the new Essential-tier plans: https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/postgres-essential-tier
We launched Essential-0/1/2 plans with pgvector
!
https://devcenter.heroku.com/changelog-items/2877
We have set Essential-0 as default for Review Apps/CI. Thank you for all your support!
@jbrown-heroku Is it planned to add pgvector to in-dyno databases ?
Required Terms
What service(s) is this request for?
Postgres
Tell us about what you're trying to solve. What challenges are you facing?
https://github.com/heroku/roadmap/issues/156 added support for
pg_vector
but only for non-Essential tier databases. As review apps are running using an Essential-tier database, it makes it impossible to use bothpg_vector
and review apps.It would be great to bring
pg_vector
to Essential-tier databases as well.