Closed herrBez closed 6 years ago
Let's remove 2. In 4, let's say "checking that the block header is valid" Change enum with itemize
Rather than delete 2 I would like to merge 2 and 3. For the rest, I totally agree with u.
Something like
re-performing all transactions. This includes re-executing all EVM computations ...
Good for me
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, 13:12 herrBez, notifications@github.com wrote:
Something like
re-performing all transactions. This includes re-executing all EVM computations ...
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/herrBez/ethereum-scalability/issues/59#issuecomment-417632795, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFpVVAKKkGVdYMc-QQVjrmP3fBqvf6Fsks5uWRoOgaJpZM4WUukL .
I know, that I have written this part ^^, but I think that points 2 already include points 3. In addition the nodes should verify the whole block header and not only the nonce, e.g. they should verify that the gas limit is contained in the range
Moreover, we use an enumeration, but the order is surely, different. I think that my client would previously check the block header and also the nonce and only after may think to compute the transactions