Why addressing do not support scale * index form.

[CaoZhongZ]

Any reason why xbyak do not support form like:

lea(r9, ptr[rdi + 4 * r15]);

And must using

lea(r9, ptr[rdi + r15 * 4]);

I'm transforming some assembly to xbyak jit, it is painful to adjust too many order of scale and index.

[herumi]

Any reason why xbyak do not support form like:

Because nobody did want the feature.

it is painful to adjust too many order of scale and index.

I see. I'll support the feature.

[CaoZhongZ]

Thanks for the reply! I was just afraid that there might be consequence if overload operator* for it, if there isn't, support the other order would make transform script easier. 😄

[herumi]

I've supported it. https://github.com/herumi/xbyak/commit/1f119a04ac5d6b5555a16af4398dcec47adaab8e

[CaoZhongZ]

Thanks!