Closed hesa closed 6 months ago
When identifying compatibility_as, using flame compat <license>, you can validate:
compatibility_as
flame compat <license>
--validate-spdx
--validate-relaxed
--validate-osadl
It would be useful to have the same possibility when identifying license, using flame license <license>
flame license <license>
Fixed by #133
When identifying
compatibility_as
, usingflame compat <license>
, you can validate:--validate-spdx
- Validate that the resulting license expression is valid according to SPDX syntax--validate-relaxed
- Validate that the resulting license expression is valid according to SPDX syntax, but allow non SPDX identifiers--validate-osadl
- Validate that the resulting licenses are supported by OSADL's compatibility matrixIt would be useful to have the same possibility when identifying license, using
flame license <license>