Closed snip closed 8 years ago
It is failing again and again :(
Can you confirm that:
You can also attach the log file here so that I can inspect it. If it doesn't show anything interesting, and it's still failing, you can bump the log level to 'debug' (adjust the command line in /etc/default/aprsc or equivalent, replace '-e info' with '-e debug').
Hi hessu,
in fact as i'm running 2 instances of aprsc, one was still running. But you are true: one is stopping without saying anything in normal logs.
So to fix that i was restarting process.
With debug i was able to identify one client which is using a very large aprs filter at login time. Error message in logs are the following:
Dropped packet (-18: long_packet) len 1473
When i filter client IP by ACL, i don't have anymore the issue. This client is also doing lot of different connection to the aprsc server.
Logs sent by mail.
Thanks
Ok, thanks. It seems like the log probably does not reveal the actual trigger of the crash, it dies before it has a chance of logging the input which causes the crash.
Does the 'dmesg' command print out a segmentation fault message for aprsc? Do you get a core dump of aprsc in /var/crash?
If yes, please provide the core dump (along with precise operating system and aprsc version numbers).
Unfortunately not. It is possible my linux has coredump disabled.
I think I can now reproduce one crash which is probably the one seen here. Made a test case for it last night.
Good news. Thanks.
Please try out v2.0.20 which is released now. It includes a fix for a bug that I could reproduce, which matches the description well.
Hi, i upgraded 3 days ago. No issue so far. But i don't know if the aprs client is still sending the faulty message.
I will update if any. Thanks
Hi,
i just got 2 occurrences of my both aprsc servers still running but were not able to respond anymore to any TCP requests (http ou aprs). Existing TCP connections were also dropped. Logs were no more updating.
Both servers which got the issue at same time was running aprsc 2.0.19-g05a4d35
Unfortunately, I don't have so much information, but maybe it can comes from one client having bad behavior ...
Any idea is welcome.
Thanks