Closed Amustache closed 2 years ago
I am not sure who is the best person to review this. Maybe start with @emmanuel-hestia then @fquellec to do the final merge?
Discussion with @alexbfree re: data-specific
tl;dr No exact specification for now.
ok well the way i conceptualise it is to think about the person and the concepts that exist in their life. ie. the things that are modelled by the data, rather than the technical facets of the data.
so - locations, activities, ads-and-targeting, social-history, interests, etc
kind of like asking 'what does this mean to me' if it was your own data
i don't think we need a strict taxonomy up front. it can evolve as we get new data to put in
And no detailed template for now, correct?
correct. i don't think so. describe what we have rather than anticipating stuff we don't have.
in fact - letting this evolve will be a good contribution to a future abstract model we might design
Sorry for taking so long to address this merge. This is a very good idea, thank you very much @Amustache and @alexbfree for working on this!
Changelog corresponds roughly to the discussion in #5
To explicit, here is an example of a change:
Basically, grouping and merging every info into a single folder, without loss of generality and/or information and/or structure.
To be discussed: Workshop folder (cf. #8)