The following two lines of code seem to be a typo. Based on experience, fallback_bufsz and fallback_nrooms should be multiplied by 2 first and then a constant is added, instead of multiplying by (2 + BLCKSZ) or (2 + 100). Otherwise, it will cause the growth rate of fallback_bufsz
and fallback_nrooms to be too fast, leading to an OOM issue.
…nd nrooms
The following two lines of code seem to be a typo. Based on experience,
fallback_bufsz
andfallback_nrooms
should be multiplied by 2 first and then a constant is added, instead of multiplying by (2 + BLCKSZ) or (2 + 100). Otherwise, it will cause the growth rate of fallback_bufsz and fallback_nrooms to be too fast, leading to an OOM issue.