Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
A possible workaround in some cases is to use receive with a timeout parameter
inside
of a loop.
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2008 at 11:08
From the user:
"""
I've tested it and I thought that signals sent while doing receive() didn't go
to the
process, but I've tested it once again and the case it that signals are
received, but
n signals (n > 1) are collapsed to one. This is not a problem for me. So, it
seems
that the whole issue is more an enhancement than a "bug". Thanks :).
"""
Original comment by fullung@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2008 at 8:26
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fullung@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2008 at 2:37