Open aj-foster opened 2 years ago
Hi @aj-foster! What's the status of this PR?
Hi @ericmj I still need to respond to your comments and make changes based on the merged changes to hex_core. Apologies for not cleaning this up sooner.
@aj-foster No worries, just checking in to get the status. I will leave the PR open and you can get to it if you get the time. Thank you! 💜
Hi @ericmj — Made some updates to this PR. Hopefully I re-understood everything correctly, since it's been a while. 🙂 Just a few comments in the above threads to make sure I'm on the right track.
This PR supersedes #920. See that PR for previous discussion.
In this PR, we add a
mix hex.registry add
command to the existing mix task. The purpose of this command is to allow private registry maintainers to add one or more packages to an existing registry without necessarily having all of the package tarballs present.At the time or writing, this PR is a minimal effort for the purpose of discussion. We have an opportunity to make larger changes to the
hex.registry
task to support future growth, if desired.Some topics to consider:
remove
,retire
)?create_local_registry
or even anin_local_registry
macro?With your guidance, I'm happy to contribute towards the right solution for the long term.