Closed rliebig closed 11 years ago
I just though about this - this would be nonsense. It would be more logically:
Vulnerability: <site> <Name of ther Vulnerabilit> <additional message>
...
How's that any different from the current output?
The notation I used is a bit unclear. It should look like:
Vulnerability: http://test <Name of the Vulnerabilit> additional message
Closed via 675fd78
The current output would be difficult to parse. The format should look like the following:
Also, the log messages should be adjusted. The type of the vulnerability should directly be something like "XYZ Injection" and not "XYZ Vulnerability".