Open fredemmott opened 4 years ago
What's the rationale for this? Do we expect the documentation to not build on different systems (with the same HHVM version)?
I remember seeing some problems with non-HHVM parts of the environment, but I can't find the PR/issue/commit - @lexidor , any idea?
Oh, the Ruby stuff. Makes sense.
This should probably be:
These should test standard developer workflow, rather than the 'build a docker image' workflow.
It might be best to do this on GitHub actions side-by-side with the current TravisCI jobs, then separately look at migrating the TravisCI test and deploy jobs there too for consistency.