Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Thanks for the detailed information. This has been fixed in r80. The bug was
introduced in r73 when VITask started using VIProperty.
I agree with you regarding the first issue you mention (the method returning
two different object types depending on the sync_run parameter). These should
probably be two separate methods. I've created issue #21 to evaluate if this
should be changed.
Thanks again!
Original comment by argo...@gmail.com
on 10 Sep 2012 at 3:35
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
e.comha...@gmail.com
on 10 Sep 2012 at 9:39