Closed joshgoebel closed 3 years ago
Thanks @joshgoebel . @cyblue9 I guess this is because we might move to using them in the future? Tbh it's working pretty well at the moment, so I don't think changing it is a high priority with your/my limited time :)
So I guess we could remove the lexemes stuff just to avoid confusion.
@joshgoebel @benswift
Sorry for late response.
Thank you for advice.
At the time of writing this source, I didn't understand how to use "lexemes".
Perhaps it's okay to remove the lexeme
.
I will commit this weekend!
It only affects keywords, and now it's been replaced by keywords.$pattern
, to make this clearer.
@joshgoebel
Hmm, I read highlightjs docs. I understood how to use keywords.$pattern
(old lexeme
).
It's doesn't do anything in this source.
I removed lexeme
at bdb27b37c86c968371288062052e2a5ad4190a47
.
Please review!
@benswift Is it OK of syntax highlight in extempore docs ? (I checked it myself)
lexemes
doesn't do anything unless paired withkeywords
which you aren't using (that I can see). So you could remove it entirely.