search

hiivan / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

No reason for AB3 to be mentioned in DG #3

Open hiivan opened 5 months ago

hiivan commented 5 months ago

In the Developer Guide, page 27, it mentions the term AB3 twice and AddressBook-Level3. This is not relevant to the Assetbook Application at all.

Screenshot as shown: image.png

Potential solution: Remove all mentions of AB3.

nus-se-bot commented 5 months ago

Team's Response

As mentioned in our project homepage, AssetBook is based on AB3. As a team, we have agreed beforehand that the UG and DG quality standards should be higher than the parent project (as a baseline), and hence this was added as a NFR. However, we recognize that as the project continues its lifecycle, it would be good to define our own UG and DG quality requirements, rather than relying on the parent project (which justifies response.NotInScope).

image.png

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]