hijacob / pokemon-randomiser

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/pokemon-randomiser
0 stars 0 forks source link

Feature Request - randomized movesets & TMs #6

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I'd like to request a feature-set similar to the Gen 1 & Gen 2 randomizers, in 
an effort to make the game more exciting.

This would require:
1) Randomize moves that are learned during level-up
2) Randomize what moves TMs contain (but not HMs)
3) Randomize which pokemon can learn which TMs

See similar features in the Gen 1 randomizer at 
http://artemis251.fobby.net/downloads/redblue/

Original issue reported on code.google.com by toop.st...@gmail.com on 17 Dec 2012 at 8:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
That looks doable.

An issue with doing this is your starter may have no attacking moves (as may 
any low levelled pokemon).

Original comment by pateandrew@gmail.com on 19 Dec 2012 at 8:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
A basic version of the feature has been added in version 1.3.

Attacking move protection for the starters has not been implemented yet.  Most 
starters will have a 10% chance of having no attacking moves.

Original comment by pateandrew@gmail.com on 24 Dec 2012 at 8:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The TM moves seem to be listed twice in the ROMs for FireRed and LeafGreen and 
I'm changing the wrong list.

Fixed in version 1.3.1.

Original comment by pateandrew@gmail.com on 27 Dec 2012 at 2:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Re: 1,3

It looks like this applies to some of the ruby/sapphire/emerald pokemon only, 
due to the moveset and tm compatibility data not being contiguous.  Will be 
fixed in the next release.

Re: 2
I can confirm that Move Tutors are not being randomised yet.

Re: 4
That's odd.  I can't reproduce that.

Original comment by pateandrew@gmail.com on 29 Dec 2012 at 1:29