Closed rouzwelt closed 1 year ago
about your question, well I understand your point, however bundling, pollyfilling for browser is really prone to stupid errors, at least in my experience, so personally if there is a package for browser that is already available that takes care of those things, I'd rather use that, it's just easier imo.
hey @hildjj , let me know if the update is ok now, I would really appreciate it if you can consider the merge if all is fine. thank you
Waiting for this! It would be better for me having the types availables for cbor-web too!
@hildjj hey man, are good to merge? I'd really appreciate it we can sort this out soon.
Awesome! Thanks ❤️
thank you a lot man, really appreciate it 🙏🏻 just wondering does it automatically publish on npm? or if not is it possible for you to publish this so we can get it from npm?
No, this won't publish automatically. It takes a ton of manual work to get a release out, and there's a bunch of stuff I need to fix before a release will work. I'll get to it eventually, but it's not going to happen for a week or two. You can use a github dependency until then: npm install hildjj/cbor
might do it.
ok got it, well thank you, I'll be patiently waiting for it. keep up your great work 👍🏻
add types (dts) to cbor-web when they are generated for cobr package, so cbor-web can be used in typescript browser projects easily.
this is the simplest solution I could come up with to include types for cbor-web, however better solutions possibly can be achieved by original authors as they are much more familar with the monorepo structure.