Closed northerngit closed 3 years ago
Hi,
Would there be any objection to providing .tar.gz archives in lieu of, or alongside the binary releases? This would make it easier for us to incorporate into an existing CI pipeline for building RPMs; without requiring unique templates. For example:
.goreleaser.yml
archives: - format: tar.gz
Thanks!
@northerngit I have no objections.
:tada: This issue has been resolved in version 2.0.3 :tada:
The release is available on GitHub release
Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:
Hi,
Would there be any objection to providing .tar.gz archives in lieu of, or alongside the binary releases? This would make it easier for us to incorporate into an existing CI pipeline for building RPMs; without requiring unique templates. For example:
.goreleaser.yml
Thanks!