Open Jean-Baptiste-Camps opened 7 years ago
What is exactly the issue (apart from the weird but possible distribution of morph scores)?
Maybe this needs further testing, but I think the issue is precisely the weird distribution of morph scores. I still have that kind of difference after 100 epochs, and on two different corpora.
Not impossible, but that would be improbable, no ?
Try comparing different parameter combinations, and also using the pytorch model. If its indeed a code bug, chances are high that you see similar behavior on other datasets as well. If you still see it, i’d ask for a replicable example. On Fri 24. Nov 2017 at 22:28, Jean-Baptiste-Camps notifications@github.com wrote:
Not impossible, but that would be improbable, no ?
— You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/hipster-philology/pandora/issues/77#issuecomment-346897802, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF6How0YoW-2WTZbCvTlh72huFRG29C1ks5s5zTxgaJpZM4QB6SI .
I've encountered a likely bug in morph evaluation with single label (does not seem to happen with multilabel, as far as I can see), using Keras and convolutions. Here is the evaluation of an epoch :
I wonder what causes this strange behaviour…