Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by e...@wahlstromstekniska.se
on 16 May 2012 at 3:41
Original comment by kpgriz...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 5:03
Following is the suggested change in the text to fix this issue: This is also
discussed in the mail thread on cloud-directory list:
https://groups.google.com/group/cloud-directory/browse_thread/thread/f294730a041
59b12
Old:
Unique identifier for the Resource as defined by the Service Consumer. The
externalId may simplify identification of the Resource between Service Consumer
and Service provider by allowing the Consumer to refer to the Resource with its
own identifier, obviating the need to store a local mapping between the local
identifier of the Resource and the identifier used by the Service Provider.
Each Resource MAY include a non-empty externalId value. The value of the
externalId attribute is always issued be the Service Consumer and can never be
specified by the Service Provider. This identifier MUST be unique across the
Service Consumer's entire set of Resources. It MUST be a stable,
non-reassignable identifier that does not change when the same Resource is
returned in subsequent requests. The Service Provider MUST always interpret the
externalId as scoped to the Service Consumer's tenant.
New:
An identifier for the Resource as defined by the Service Consumer. The
externalId may simplify identification of the Resource between Service Consumer
and Service provider by allowing the Consumer to refer to the Resource with its
own identifier, obviating the need to store a local mapping between the local
identifier of the Resource and the identifier used by the Service Provider.
Each Resource MAY include a non-empty externalId value. The value of the
externalId attribute is always issued be the Service Consumer and can never be
specified by the Service Provider. The Service Provider MUST always interpret
the externalId as scoped to the Service Consumer's tenant.
Original comment by hasini@wso2.com
on 10 Jun 2012 at 2:07
Fixed as per revision 190.
Original comment by hasini@wso2.com
on 25 Jun 2012 at 3:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
e...@wahlstromstekniska.se
on 16 May 2012 at 12:07