Wrong owner of bns name

[friedger]

Describe the bug The endpoint https://stacks-node-api.mainnet.stacks.co/v1/names/ape.mega shows SPC0KWNBJ61BDZRPF3W2GHGK3G3GKS8WZ7ND33PS as owner. However, the nft is owned by SPV48Q8E5WP4TCQ63E9TV6KF9R4HP01Z8WS3FBTG through tx https://explorer.stacks.co/txid/0xf9f9144793f6d4da9aba92a54ab601eb23bfe7f44c1edb29c2920bf5e7d2ac16?chain=mainnet

To Reproduce Compare the two links provided

Expected behavior the endpoint should show SPV48Q8E5WP4TCQ63E9TV6KF9R4HP01Z8WS3FBTG as owner

[rafaelcr]

Thanks @friedger ... this looks like it's caused by the API not handling a name-register and name-transfer in the same transaction. I'll take a further look.

[blockstack-devops]

:tada: This issue has been resolved in version 6.0.0-beta.9 :tada:

The release is available on:

• npm package (@beta dist-tag)
• npm package (@beta dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:

[badonyx]

The endpoint is not consistently showing the correct address still. Oddly it is switching back and forth when I fetch the endpoint a few times.

[rafaelcr]

@0xBabo that behavior is part of our normal release process... we're deploying the API v6 right now (which contains the fix) but we do a rollout so we can slowly send traffic into the new env. If everything looks good we do the full switch, which as far as I can see is going along fine and will happen perhaps tomorrow.

[badonyx]

Thanks for the update. Probably worth noting that this actually resulted in 2 erroneous NFT transfers just last night, but I think I can contact the Ryder address owners to sort it out.

[blockstack-devops]

:tada: This issue has been resolved in version 6.0.0 :tada:

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:

[rafaelcr]

FYI @0xBabo v6 is now live in production with this fix

[badonyx]

I am only seeing the wrong result now, and old version at https://stacks-node-api.mainnet.stacks.co/extended/v1/status

"server_version": "stacks-blockchain-api v5.0.1 (master:499065fb)"

[Murgo12]

Hi! I have this issue:

1. During last month I had juice.btc replaced by SP3CFGFXW243Z2E3736HQJV2K5C3RF288WV6E0ARY (rob.btc). All nfts from surveys, giveaways, with juice,btc name participated, was sent to this wallet. Can we get them out ?
2. https://stacks-node-api.mainnet.stacks.co/v1/names/juice.btc now shows SP252Z93VEGQ5TKY5RMCETHEXG6CF215GGT1EVS2T as owner. However, the name nft is owned by SP3QC4R6M7M0DAZBXSZCW4FWGDCNDD05FV8Y0AY8C.

[rafaelcr]

Hi @0xBabo @Morguf apologies for the setback, we had to rollback to v5 temporarily while we fix an unrelated bug, we'll re-deploy v6 ASAP which will fix the name owners and display them correctly again

[blockstack-devops]

:tada: This issue has been resolved in version 7.0.0-stacks-2.1.2 :tada:

The release is available on:

• npm package (@stacks-2.1 dist-tag)
• npm package (@stacks-2.1 dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:

[Murgo12]

Hi! The issue was met once again a month ago. NFT was transferred to SP3CFGFXW243Z2E3736HQJV2K5C3RF288WV6E0ARY instead of SP3QC4R6M7M0DAZBXSZCW4FWGDCNDD05FV8Y0AY8C https://explorer.stacks.co/txid/0x821e10c720e21250145853f0e514da9721cf3005de2c014f845c30b965ae6951?chain=mainnet

[rafaelcr]

hi @Morguf the tx you shared is a contract deploy. Could you share the tx where the name was transferred between those addresses so we can take a look?

[Murgo12]

https://explorer.stacks.co/address/SP3CFGFXW243Z2E3736HQJV2K5C3RF288WV6E0ARY?chain=mainnet - last transaction cx-tokens transfer

https://gamma.io/rob.btc

[rafaelcr]

@Morguf the transaction you shared did not emit a name-transfer BNS event. This event is necessary for a name to go from one owner to the next. Perhaps there's still another step you need to take with that contract to make the transfer happen?

[badonyx]

https://stacks-node-api.mainnet.stacks.co/v1/names/juice.btc

@Morguf the API shows the address SP3QC4R6M7M0DAZBXSZCW4FWGDCNDD05FV8Y0AY8C for the name juice.btc. Does not seem like an API issue. In this case you should contact the sender to figure out why they sent to the wrong address.