I have deleted (commented out for now, actually) dwc:associatedOccurrenceID and dwc:associatedOccurrenceType. These are not Darwin Core terms and also, we had decided to use dwc:associatedOccurrences and have it share hispid:associationType with dwc:associatedTaxa. So I have added dwc:associatedTaxa instead.
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/associatedOccurrences">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Associated Occurrences</rdfs:label>
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/>
<skos:definition xml:lang="en">A list (concatenated and separated) of identifiers
of other Occurrence records and their associations to this Occurrence.
</skos:definition>
<dwcattributes:status>recommended</dwcattributes:status>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/"/>
<dwcattributes:organizedInClass rdf:resource="http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/Occurrence"/>
</rdf:Description>
I think now also that it is best to remove hispid:associationType term, as it cannot be used by itself, and only have the vocabulary.
I have deleted (commented out for now, actually) dwc:associatedOccurrenceID and dwc:associatedOccurrenceType. These are not Darwin Core terms and also, we had decided to use dwc:associatedOccurrences and have it share hispid:associationType with dwc:associatedTaxa. So I have added dwc:associatedTaxa instead.
I think now also that it is best to remove hispid:associationType term, as it cannot be used by itself, and only have the vocabulary.