Closed ben3000 closed 8 years ago
DWC uses dwcattributes="http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/attributes/" dwcattributes:status - this has a restricted vocabulary that may not be suitable for our purpose
Values for this term should be either "recommended" or "historical".
So we first need to agree on the status vocabulary that we want to track. I will ask Alistair what they are doing in the OGC space.
from Alistair:
off the top of my head: no. status is often inferred, ie be the presence of a deprecation data, or superseded by property.
one approach would be to use dc:valid - but this is only a date range, so the status is inferred....
this may be an approach:
<owl:DeprecatedProperty>true</owl:DeprecatedProperty>
<dc:valid>1997-01-01/2015-01-30</dc:valid>
So this begs the question: do we put the deprecated elements into HISPID Terms 1.0 (and thus give them new camelCased names and URIs etc.) just so we can mark them as deprecated?
Terms should have a status, e.g. "current", so that it is clear whether a term is in current use, and allows us to deprecate terms in the future.