fields to be documented properly in hispidtermshistory

AaronWilton commented 8 years ago

I feel we are loosing information when we put things across into the history file. I am copying the rdf from terms into this issue as an interim measure.

AaronWilton commented 8 years ago

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/nearestNamedPlace">
        <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Nearest Named Place</rdfs:label>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/>
        <skos:definition xml:lang="en">The nearest named place to the collecting locality. </skos:definition>
        <dwcattributes:status>under consideration</dwcattributes:status>
        <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/"/>
        <dcterms:modified rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date">2015-07-11</dcterms:modified>
        <dcterms:hasVersion rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/nearestNamedPlace-2015-07-11"/>
        <dwcattributes:abcdEquivalence>//Unit/Gathering/NearNamedPlaces/NamedPlaceRelation/NearNamedPlace</dwcattributes:abcdEquivalence>
        <dcterms:replaces rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/nnp-hispid5"/>
        <skos:note xml:lang="en">We do not want to use this as generalised locality any more. There are still two use cases: (1) a nearest named placed given by a collector when the collecting locality doesn't have a name or is obscure and (2) the place name the georeference is based on when the name of the locality can't be found in any gazetteer. The latter use case probably desrves its own term.</skos:note>
        <dwcattributes:organizedInClass rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/terms/Location"/>
    </rdf:Description>

AaronWilton commented 8 years ago

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/identificationQualifierRank">
        <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Identification Qualifier Rank</rdfs:label>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/>
        <skos:definition xml:lang="en">Rank at which the identificationQualifier applies</skos:definition>
        <dwcattributes:status>current</dwcattributes:status>
        <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/"/>
        <dcterms:modified rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date">2015-07-11</dcterms:modified>
        <dcterms:hasVersion rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/identificationQualifierRank-2015-07-11"/>
        <dcterms:replaces rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/rkql-hispid5"/>
        <dwcattributes:organizedInClass rdf:resource="http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/Identification"/>
    </rdf:Description>

nielsklazenga commented 8 years ago

The history document I made only once almost a year ago and then never looked again, so it is bound to be incomplete. It should have at least all the information that is in terms.rdf.

The two terms you copied in here, by the way, have never been in HISPID, just in the document we have been developing, so should not end up in the history document. The HISPID 5 version of these fields should be the last in the history file, with a skos:changeNote why we are not using it any more.

AaronWilton commented 8 years ago

from issue #11


<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/hybridParent1">
        <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Hybrid Parent1</rdfs:label>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/>
        <skos:definition xml:lang="en">Scientific name of the first parent of a hybrid</skos:definition>
        <dwcattributes:status>under consideration</dwcattributes:status>
        <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/"/>
        <dcterms:modified rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date">2015-07-11</dcterms:modified>
        <dcterms:hasVersion rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/hybridParent1-2015-07-11"/>
        <skos:note>GitHub: https://github.com/hiscom/hispid/issues/11</skos:note>
        <dwcattributes:organizedInClass rdf:resource="http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/Taxon"/>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/hybridParent2">
        <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Hybrid Parent2</rdfs:label>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/>
        <skos:definition xml:lang="en">Scientific name of the second parent of a hybrid</skos:definition>
        <dwcattributes:status>under consideration</dwcattributes:status>
        <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/"/>
        <dcterms:modified rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date">2015-07-11</dcterms:modified>
        <dcterms:hasVersion rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/hybridParent2-2015-07-11"/>
        <dcterms:replaces rdf:resource="http://hiscom.chah.org.au/hispid/terms/genhy2-hispid5"/>
        <skos:note>GitHub: https://github.com/hiscom/hispid/issues/11</skos:note>
        <dwcattributes:organizedInClass rdf:resource="http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/Taxon"/>
    </rdf:Description>

hiscom / hispid

fields to be documented properly in hispidtermshistory #98