search

historical-data / schema

Microdata schema for historical data.
historical-data.org
30 stars 4 forks source link

rename 'document' to 'record' #21

Closed stoicflame closed 13 years ago

stoicflame commented 13 years ago

I propose we rename 'document' to 'record' to conform to common convention, industry standard, and to more accurately reflect its generic use.

ninjudd commented 13 years ago

I'm not opposed to changing this. We should just make sure whatever term we use is general enough to encompass all types of records/documents.

On Sep 13, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Ryan Heatonreply@reply.github.com wrote:

I propose we rename 'document' to 'record' to conform to common convention, industry standard, and to more accurately reflect its generic use.

You can merge this Pull Request by running:

git pull https://github.com/FamilySearch/historical-data.org rename-document-to-record

Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:

https://github.com/historical-data/schema/pull/21

-- Commit Summary --

  • rename 'document' to 'record' to conform to common convention, industry standard, and to more accurately reflect its generic use.

-- File Changes --

M HistoricalEvent.html (4) M HistoricalFamily.html (4) M HistoricalPerson.html (4) R HistoricalRecord.html (30)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/historical-data/schema/pull/21.patch https://github.com/historical-data/schema/pull/21.diff

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/historical-data/schema/pull/21

stoicflame commented 13 years ago

Hi. Just waking up this thread. Can I apply this?

ninjudd commented 13 years ago

Go for it.

On Sep 20, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Ryan Heatonreply@reply.github.com wrote:

Hi. Just waking up this thread. Can I apply this?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/historical-data/schema/pull/21#issuecomment-2147179