historical-data / schema

Microdata schema for historical data.
historical-data.org
30 stars 4 forks source link

Newby Finds Inconsistencies #29

Closed ghost closed 12 years ago

ghost commented 12 years ago

Friends, as a new collaborator to this project, I have perused the schema and have come up with some observations. Since I'm new, I am hesitant to classify any of these as bugs and am soliciting your guidance in that determination. Here's the list.

Mike

In all four schema entities:

HistoricalRecord:

HistoricalPerson:

Country:

tonyruscoe commented 12 years ago

In all four schema entities: • url: I agree that this should always have an expected type of “URL”

HistoricalRecord: • locations: This should probably be “Place or PostalAddress” like HistoricalEvent locations • note: While notes could be added to all entities, it seems more common to have notes against records

HistoricalPerson: • spouses: Technically it doesn’t replace the spouse property, but perhaps a recommendation that it should be used instead of spouse would be good.

Country: The expect type (schema.org/Country) offers a geo property that lets you specify coordinates. I guess that means you could provide different country names for the same coordinates. I’m not sure how HistoricalPlace would differ to this. Any suggestions?

ghost commented 12 years ago

I'm OOO this week while visiting the Design West conference in San Jose. Friday I will be on-campus hosting a referral for lunch who would like to add @google.com to the end of his email address. So I will be unable to do anything about this for a while.

I also suppose I should have joined the historical-data.org with my @google email.

Mike

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Tony Ruscoe < reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

In all four schema entities: url: I agree that this should always have an expected type of URL

HistoricalRecord: locations: This should probably be Place or PostalAddress like HistoricalEvent locations note: While notes could be added to all entities, it seems more common to have notes against records

HistoricalPerson: spouses: Technically it doesnt replace the spouse property, but perhaps a recommendation that it should be used instead of spouse would be good.

Country: The expect type (schema.org/Country) offers a geo property that lets you specify coordinates. I guess that means you could provide different country names for the same coordinates. Im not sure how HistoricalPlace would differ to this. Any suggestions?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/historical-data/schema/issues/29#issuecomment-4704319

Mike Rossetti mrossetti@gmail.com

Universal: 801-TRY-MIKE (801-879-6453)

Cynics do not contribute; Skeptics do not create; Doubters do not achieve. Bryant S. Hinckley