In response to the customization of “Show qualified in person history events #2540”
( https://github.com/hitobito/hitobito/pull/2540 ), we would like to choose our own labels for the qualifications.
Rationale and background:
We would like to explicitly avoid the terms “passing” and “failing” in the context of the qualification as different criteria from attendance to mapping in the NDS influence the qualification
A person who is merely “involved”, such as the camp kitchen or the coach, should not be emotionally confused by the technical term “not passed”. (The option “not_qualified” is technically valid for all statuses that are not “qualified”)
We are aware that the designation should and must continue to function in the sense of qualification (feature qualifications).
A support ticket for billing/support is created for the pull. Please check whether it makes sense and, if necessary, unsupport it. In case of forgotten dependencies or excessive complexity, reject and refer to a regular story.
… views.de.yml)
In response to the customization of “Show qualified in person history events #2540” ( https://github.com/hitobito/hitobito/pull/2540 ), we would like to choose our own labels for the qualifications.
Rationale and background:
A support ticket for billing/support is created for the pull. Please check whether it makes sense and, if necessary, unsupport it. In case of forgotten dependencies or excessive complexity, reject and refer to a regular story.