Closed KonradHoeffner closed 2 years ago
Yes, in my opinion, it seems that it can be deleted if recursiveness is not important. But, it is always the question of what does stand in the middle of the view, the study or the application system? In our use case, it was the study, since we tried to implement a proof-of-concept for a sophisticated evaluation study ontology. What do you think @FranziskaJahn?
Aufgabe für @MichelleBindel: Die Studien durchgehen und entsprechend Produkte hinzufügen. Alarm schlagen, falls einmal ein Feature ohne Softwareprodukt genannt wird. Mit @vdornauer abklären. Bei Fragen an @KonradHoeffner wenden.
Can we remove hito:evaluatesApplicationSystemHavingFeature? It seems to me as that information is duplicated because you can just follow the edge from study to software product and get the feature that way. Duplicated information should be avoided because it risks inconsistencies.
Example
Is triple 3 really needed or can we just remove it?