Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Is this using a robot on an old application identifier? The robot should
refresh to use
the new API after the first operation with a v2 capabilities.xml, but if it
doesn't,
then that is a bug on our end.
Can you try it with a new App ID and see what happens?
Original comment by pamela.fox
on 2 Mar 2010 at 3:36
Yes, after fixing another (unrelated) bug, it works fine using chrismdp-
test@appspot.com.
Original comment by Chris...@gmail.com
on 2 Mar 2010 at 3:45
I confirm the same situation. Same traceback when pushing to an appengine
domain which
used to have a version 1 robot. And works correctly after creating new
appengine
domain.
I used the code from the python tutorial.
Original comment by duncan.hawthorne
on 2 Mar 2010 at 9:46
For ease of debugging, can you join this forum thread?
https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:search:with%253Apublic+with%253Aforumbott
y+tag%
253Awave-api,restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252B9EgFHaidD
It will be easier to work through it there.
My current explorations have not found a bug on our part yet.
Original comment by pamela.fox
on 2 Mar 2010 at 11:54
Ran into the same problem. After starting a new wave with the robot (to get
/_wave/capabilities.xml reloaded) the error disappeared.
Original comment by martin.b...@gmail.com
on 12 Jun 2010 at 4:11
But problem remains for existing waves with the robot. Removing the robot and
adding it again to the wave has no effect.
Original comment by martin.b...@gmail.com
on 12 Jun 2010 at 4:46
Found a tip by Duncan on the debugging wave:
as a workaround I removed character-entity@appspot.com from my waves and added
character-entity+1@appspot.com, which if your robot isnt handling proxy
requests means the same code is run
This sounds like a nice option since it doesn't require setting up a new
appengine ID, and it continues to access the existing data stored for the
application.
Original comment by Klaus.We...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2010 at 12:54
FYI, the "name+1" trick didn't work when I tried it today, but adding the
version ("name#VERSION@appspot.com") did the trick. Unfortunately there's no
easy way to communicate that to users in whose waves the robot isn't working.
Original comment by Klaus.We...@gmail.com
on 30 Jun 2010 at 3:15
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Chris...@gmail.com
on 2 Mar 2010 at 3:34