I use the kernelized memory when evaluate STCN while did not use it when training. But the result showed a slight decrease. The raw J&F-Mean of davis2016val is 0.916, davis2017val is 0.853and davis2017testdev is 0.755 . After I use the kernelized memory, J&F-Mean of davis2016val is 0.913, davis2017val is 0.852 and davis2017testdev is 0.750 . Does it because the kernelized memory need training? But why it need training since it has no trainable parameters?
It does not need training. It might be because KMN is implicitly solving the memory domination problem using spatial query constraint, leading to diminishing returns when used in conjunction with STCN.
I use the kernelized memory when evaluate STCN while did not use it when training. But the result showed a slight decrease. The raw J&F-Mean of
davis2016val
is0.916
,davis2017val
is0.853
anddavis2017testdev
is0.755
. After I use the kernelized memory, J&F-Mean ofdavis2016val
is0.913
,davis2017val
is0.852
anddavis2017testdev
is0.750
. Does it because the kernelized memory need training? But why it need training since it has no trainable parameters?