jonathanlintott
commented
7 years ago I have had similar requests from Chris Bugg as well, especially regarding allowing the uncertainty in Module II to vary laterally depending on pinch out locations.
I will have to have a look into the data structures that Geocanopy has for geobodies and if they would be suitable to represent an isochore, as the data importer would need to differentiate between an isochore and a normal horizon surface too. This might not be able to make it into the initial release unfortunately.
From Trine.
Option for adding a thickness map – possibly combined with both a base and a top structure for situations where the reservoir pinches out against a surface which is not the base of the reservoir (as for Bouncer where reservoir pinches out against the salt and the base map cannot be picked). An isochore surface could also be merged with the surface that the reservoir is pinching out against but this might create issues in module II as the uncertainty on the merged surface will be considerable different from the isochored part to the mapped part.