Open runjtu opened 4 months ago
FAST-LIVO2 excels in geometric accuracy and real-time performance, while NeRF-based methods are superior in rendering realism, especially for anisotropic materials like glass and metal. Additionally, even with SDF constraints, I believe its structural metrics struggle to outperform our method across various datasets.
Congrats to your great work! How's the perfomance of livo2/r3live in terms of reconstruction quality compared to the NeRF based (Export Mesh) methods. Thanks a lot!