[Question - Functional] Support Parameters fit in PlanDefinition, what about patient variables ?

NathanPeeters commented 7 months ago

There's actually two levels of variables to be received from PSS to EPD and not one.

Currently, we use the resource Plan definition to return the data required in the field input.requirement (fieldtype datarequirement) :

The problem is that when we analyze the fieldtype datarequirement in FHIR, we see that we can't put two levels of variable in the structure :

Is it possible to structure it in PlanDefinition
Would another resource be relevant instead of planDefinition (for example, something more flexible like parameters ?)

NathanPeeters commented 6 months ago

Following 24/04/2024 meeting with José : If this solution is maintained, possibility to use field "profile" to integrate a questionnaire. Nathan answer : Not sure it is feasable, but I found "definition(x)" in the plan definition that maybe could fit to associate a questionnaireResponse

costateixeira commented 1 month ago

I think this has been answered in the examples https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/pss/branches/cpg-guidance/functional-overview.html

hl7-be / pss

[Question - Functional] Support Parameters fit in PlanDefinition, what about patient variables ? #18