During this morning's meeting, you refocused the discussion on the FHIR repository and how to interact with it.
User workflow and fail back procedures are currently ignored aspects.
The functional changes that will have to be made to the software will be quite significant and will have an impact on the daily work of doctors.
Using more structured data is going to be a big change and using Snomed CT (with its high level of details) is going to require a lot of coaching in addition to development.
I think, for this project to be a success, it would be necessary as quickly as possible to organize a meeting to present the project in which you would invite, in addition to software suppliers, the medical departments of Belgian hospitals.
As Mr Rossler pointed out earlier this week, you are going to impose a lot of changes in a short time, this must be anticipated.
Furthermore, the fact of hiding the functional part and the management of unavailability does not allow us to choose the way to implement your needs in the flows of an existing EPR.
As these are mandatory points (will there be a royal decree on this subject?), it seems necessary to talk about all the parts of the project, not only communication and data storage.
What do you think about it ?
One more question, between 2028 and 2030, Zorgi will decommission 2 of its old hospital softwares.
We will only keep one product. Is it possible to obtain a form of exemption for the 2 old products?
Good morning,
Thank you for inviting us to these meetings.
During this morning's meeting, you refocused the discussion on the FHIR repository and how to interact with it. User workflow and fail back procedures are currently ignored aspects. The functional changes that will have to be made to the software will be quite significant and will have an impact on the daily work of doctors. Using more structured data is going to be a big change and using Snomed CT (with its high level of details) is going to require a lot of coaching in addition to development. I think, for this project to be a success, it would be necessary as quickly as possible to organize a meeting to present the project in which you would invite, in addition to software suppliers, the medical departments of Belgian hospitals. As Mr Rossler pointed out earlier this week, you are going to impose a lot of changes in a short time, this must be anticipated.
Furthermore, the fact of hiding the functional part and the management of unavailability does not allow us to choose the way to implement your needs in the flows of an existing EPR. As these are mandatory points (will there be a royal decree on this subject?), it seems necessary to talk about all the parts of the project, not only communication and data storage. What do you think about it ?
One more question, between 2028 and 2030, Zorgi will decommission 2 of its old hospital softwares. We will only keep one product. Is it possible to obtain a form of exemption for the 2 old products?
Sincerely,