Open bdc-ehealth opened 1 year ago
Available on the issue-265 branch, waiting for WG approval.
Thanks @bdc-ehealth for the update.
Is it available on the last Implementation Guide ? I do not see the change yet in the package.tgz : The page http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/referral/ValueSet-be-vs-request-note-type.html has not been updated neither. Or am I using a depreciated link ?
@CyprienSmals
what do you mean by "last"? The master branch? the earlyadopters branch? the issue-265 branch which contains the elements we have been talking about, but are not yet approved by the HL7 workgroup?
@bdc-ehealth
Yep sorry I meant the master branch, but it would be helpful to add it also to the earlyadopter branch; to allow integrators to use this note as part of the two templates for the MVP. I thought it has been approved by the HL7 workgroup since this issue has been closed and the https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/pull/266 has been merged. But maybe I am too soon
@CyprienSmals ,
can I put everything from the issue-265 branch to the earlyadopter branch, or do I have to cherrypick the commit with the new code?
For me you can put everything from issue-265 into earlyadopter branch, I do not see any breaking changes in it. Thank you @bdc-ehealth .
everything from the issue-265 branch is now in the earlyadopter branch.
@CyprienSmals
Salut Bart, aurais-tu le temps de regarder à ce code (temporaire) manquant ?
Il devrait être utilisé pour les deux templates :
Diabeteseducatie via conventiecentrum
Educatie en zelfzorg bij diabetespatiënten ‘zonder traject’
Comme spécifié dans le document de l’INAMI “Verwijsvoorschrift Business Rules_Nursing_V2.10.docx”, cela serait utilisé si “Alleen beschikbaar indien “Type educatie” = “Andere””.
Voilà la partie en question dans le document:
Merci beaucoup,
Cyprien