search

hl7-be / vaccination

HL7 Belgium Vaccination (Patient Dossier) Specifications on FHIR - Development repository
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

SnomedCT <-> kmehr #124

Open hansdekeersmaecker opened 4 months ago

hansdekeersmaecker commented 4 months ago

In the care set for BeVaccination SNOMEDCT codes are used for the VaccineCode https://www.ehealth.fgov.be/standards/fhir/vaccination/ValueSet-be-vs-vaccine-code.html. But we currently have to support in different exports (sumehr, PMF...) kmehr indications of the current kmehr model: https://www.ehealth.fgov.be/standards/kmehr/en/tables/vaccine-indication-codes.

Because we need to support both systems at the same time, can a mapping table be provided so we are sure to use the correct mapping between SNOMEDCT & kmehr codes.

bdc-ehealth commented 4 months ago

This looks like terminology work to me... The impact on the FHIR structures is low/non-existant. We need the input of a medically trained person to do this.

costateixeira commented 4 months ago

To be discussed in the WG.

hansdekeersmaecker commented 3 months ago

This will probably have no impact on fhir structure indeed, but is very important for the implementation because we need to foresee both systems in parallel. For me it's indeed a medically trained person that should have look at this.

costateixeira commented 3 months ago

Yes, hence to discuss in the wg - we cannot dismiss the possible impact before discussing e.g. mapping tables. And i guess you mean a clinical terminologist? The wg should clarify what is needed from the terminologist as per Hans's request.

KarlienHL7Belgium commented 2 months ago

This has been raised before. The WG thinks that it should be part of the eHealth platform publication The work should be led by RIZIV, by @annenerenhausen, Karlien will contact her and point out that it is critical

KarlienHL7Belgium commented 1 month ago

RIZIV confirms that the mapping table will be available by end of June, including publication by eHealth platform