Closed bdc-ehealth closed 5 months ago
@NathanPeeters, @annenerenhausen
There are examples that contain 2 performers (1 organisation, 1 practitioner). Is this something we want to avoid? Another solution can be 1 performer, but with an PractitionerRole, so both practitioner and organisation can be used.
Decisions to change should be made in a working group meeting. Is there one scheduled?
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 9:49 AM Bart Decuypere (eHealth) < @.***> wrote:
@NathanPeeters https://github.com/NathanPeeters, @annenerenhausen https://github.com/annenerenhausen
There are examples that contain 2 performers (1 organisation, 1 practitioner). Is this something we want to avoid? Another solution can be 1 performer, but with an OrganisationRole, so both practitioner and organisation can be used.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/hl7-be/vaccination/issues/90#issuecomment-1308414528, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD3HUUHTOTDG2D7E3BEVK5DWHNQP5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAR3EX3OE . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
WG discussion on 23 May. In VacciCard's cookbook it is 0..1 Vitalink need to check and come back to the WG by 31 May
On Vitalink-FHIR side, it is not a problem.
Vaults are ok to change it to 0..1 but we don't see the need to change it as the spirit of the FHIR IG is also for 1 performer, so we could make the change in the next release
• La cardinalité de « Performer » doit passer de « 0..* » à « 0..1 » dans le profil FHIR eHealth