Closed dbojicic-agency closed 4 months ago
talk to Primary Care project
I think that "sex at birth" is a term best avoided. LOINC has Sex assigned at birth (76689-9) a code for US birth certificates with preferred values Male, Female and Unknown. The word "assigned" makes it clear that it is a classification.
LOINC also has Sex (46098-0) which seems closer to what we want.
LOINC Sex (46098-0) seems to be similar to METeOR Person—sex, code X, METeOR Person—sex, code A and the approach of Australian Government Guidelines on the Recognition of Sex and Gender
Link to HL7 International project page for The Gender Harmony Project; which states
This is project born of the ongoing frustration the ideas encompassed by "sex" and "gender" have never been easy to capture consistently within health models. Those terminologists among us have always said this topic was the quintessential example that proves "terminology is hard." This project is going to try use some tried and true approaches to how we model information (data elements, value sets, code systems) and use them to define/harmonize some aspects, likely not all, for representing sex/gender. This project will result in a balloted informational document that will define use-context collections that also include appropriate value sets. These artifacts can then be associated with model elements using binding parameters that are informed by the metadata the project will identify with each use context.
Proposed changes to the existing draft profile have been provided via PR #581
Sex assigned at birth is a part of supporting biological sex. It is not a complete solution.
Other concepts may need to be supported, e.g. Clinical Sex described in Patient Gender and Sex. I suggest that working on them can wait for community demand and this issue can be closed.
More changes to AU Sex Assigned At Birth will be provided in a forthcoming PR. These changes are related to evolving the informational content to provide meaningful and consistent definition, usage, guidelines etc.
There are a few items for discussion in HL7 AU PAWG meeting, see PA/2021-06-09+Minutes and PA/2021-06-23+Agenda:
Biological sex at birth and sex recorded on a birth certificate are different concepts. Noting that the values would be expected to align early in a person’s lifetime, the biological sex recorded on a person’s birth certificate may change over a person’s lifetime. LOINC 76689-9 - Sex assigned at birth seems suitable to represent the birth certificate sex but not for representing biological sex at birth. Could it be used as an acceptable translation though?
An email has been sent to LOINC to ask them the code to use to represent the biological sex at birth if there is one. Depending on their response we might submit a request to add a new term to LOINC.
Observation.performer allows the performer to be Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Organization | CareTeam | Patient | RelatedPerson. Consider constraining out the Patient as the patient is never expected to perform this observation,e.g. newborn making observation of their own biological sex at birth.
Observation.effective[x] type is constrained to dateTime only excluding Period, Timing and instant. While this seems acceptable and is easier on possible implementations to support one rather than four different types, consideration to be given whether this constraint is suitable to be made in the AU profile considering possible use cases and what it means to derived profiles; taking into account HL7 AU's AU Base principle to provide guidance not constraints.
@dbojicic-agency, action from PA WG 23/06/2021 to note in the introductory material that we are seeking clarification from LOINC on the specificity and use of that LOINC code in a biological sex assigned at birth observation. Please include this in the forthcoming PR.
Also request to point to the HL7 Gender project with the note that this is an ongoing project and when outcomes of this project are available they will need to be considered.
Thank you @dtr-agency, the introduction material has now been updated to include above actions, as well StructureDefinition update to constrain Observation.performer to Practitioner | PractitionerRole | Organization | CareTeam | RelatedPerson. Updated content is in peer review at the moment, and expected to be offered to HL7 AU via pull request by the end of the week.
Upon examining the existing SNOMED CT content around investigation and reporting different types of biological sex including karyotypic/genetic/chromosomal, gonadal, ductal, phenotypic, etc sex, the following concepts related to recording biological sex were identified:
No current content that supports the types and specific biological sex values was identified.
Consideration on pre-adoption of international material. See meeting minutes from HL7 AU FHIR working group here: https://confluence.hl7australia.com/display/PA/2023-04-12+Minutes
Further consideration in meeting minutes here: https://confluence.hl7australia.com/display/PA/2023-04-26+Minutes
f2f comment - this is superseded by gender harmony inclusion currently in progress - propose to close
eVote: now under complete review by AU Core TDG; close issue
Closed as no longer relevant https://confluence.hl7.org/display/HAFWG/2024-04-10+FHIRWG+Meeting+Minutes
FHIR Patient model allows for recording administrative gender for a patient. It does not allow recording sex for a patient and it discusses various aspects of gender and sex, please see Patient Gender and Sex. Australian Government approach is to collect gender information.
We have a requirement to record patient's biological sex (sex at birth) as well as gender. There seem to be lots of interest of addressing the issue of collecting both sex and gender information from other groups and willingness to progress clinical information systems in that directions.
Recording biological sex is important in making clinical decisions, e.g. calculating of medicine dosages and laboratory test ranges by adjusting for an individual's typical hormonal history and anatomy, or can be used for timely health checks such as mammogram, pap smear, prostate exam etc.
This issue is to discuss and come to a national agreement on how to record patient's biological sex. The solution should align with the Australian Government Guidelines on the Recognition of Sex and Gender https://www.ag.gov.au/Publications/Pages/AustralianGovernmentGuidelinesontheRecognitionofSexandGender.aspx.