Høringssvar:
Is it intentionally that the profiles don’t contain professional relationship to the patient? e.g., personal caretaker, physiotherapist, medical specialist etc.
If the standard should be used for an associated professional, the CPR-number should not be required.
Besluttet:
”personal caretaker” håndteres i #1.
Gennemgå ”Scope and Usage” for profilen og sørge for at beskrive, at sundhedsfaglige relationer som fysioterapeut varetages andetsteds, fx Patient.generalPractitioner.
AND
Høringssvar:
What is the meaning of the comment "Note also, that the intended use of Related Person is to describe a relationship in itself and that privileges which might be associated to a relationship (e.g., power of attorney) should be expressed by other means."
One of the possible values of the relationship is "power of attorney" so how does this corelate?
Besluttet:
Formulering ændres til: ”Note also, that the intended use of Related Person is to describe a relationship, where privileges which might be associated to the relationship should be expressed by other means, e.g.the actual right associated with being power of attorney, should be described in a legally binding document, and that document can be represented with the Consent resource.”
Høringssvar: Is it intentionally that the profiles don’t contain professional relationship to the patient? e.g., personal caretaker, physiotherapist, medical specialist etc. If the standard should be used for an associated professional, the CPR-number should not be required.
Besluttet: ”personal caretaker” håndteres i #1. Gennemgå ”Scope and Usage” for profilen og sørge for at beskrive, at sundhedsfaglige relationer som fysioterapeut varetages andetsteds, fx Patient.generalPractitioner.
AND
Høringssvar: What is the meaning of the comment "Note also, that the intended use of Related Person is to describe a relationship in itself and that privileges which might be associated to a relationship (e.g., power of attorney) should be expressed by other means." One of the possible values of the relationship is "power of attorney" so how does this corelate?
Besluttet: Formulering ændres til: ”Note also, that the intended use of Related Person is to describe a relationship, where privileges which might be associated to the relationship should be expressed by other means, e.g.the actual right associated with being power of attorney, should be described in a legally binding document, and that document can be represented with the Consent resource.”