Closed pbodnar closed 3 years ago
@hluk, while implementing this change, I have noticed a slight inconsistency between CopyQ's functions add(item)
and copy(mimeType, data, [mimeType, data]...)
. You can see I introduced copyItem(item)
, so that the code is kept concise. What do you think about supporting copy(item)
variant right in the CopyQ core?
Yeah, the arguments to add/set/change/copy items are really inconsistent in the API.
Since the next version will contain some bigger changes (because of JS engine upgrade), I will improve that: https://github.com/hluk/CopyQ/pull/1538
Hi, another slight, usability update to my little converter. :)